IN PRINT

CSS-Tricks and A List Apart archived the field arguing

A List Apart, Smashing Magazine, and CSS-Tricks are where the conventions were settled. The posts are dated and still readable, which is more than most industries manage.

Speaker gestures while presenting a slide titled "Comp Alley Breakdown" at a conference
The posts are dated and still readable, which is more than most industries manage.Photo: Eric Meyer at An Event Apart, 2006 · Wikimedia Commons

Where the argument happened

Most professional fields conduct their formative debates in journals, conference rooms, or private correspondence that surfaces decades later in a biographer's footnote. Web design did it on the open web, in public, with timestamps. The consequence is an archive that functions less like a library and more like a transcript: you can read the field thinking out loud about problems it had not yet solved.

Smiling man with glasses wears a gray dribbble t-shirt at a crowded event
A conference talk and a magazine post did the work a standards body could not do alone.Photo: Ethan Marcotte at Beyond Tellerrand · Wikimedia Commons

A List Apart began publishing in 1997, initially as an email newsletter circulated among people frustrated with the browser-compatibility limitations of the late-nineties web. It became the venue where foundational arguments were not merely rehearsed but resolved, or at least sharpened into the form that stuck. Ethan Marcotte published "Responsive Web Design" there in May 2010, the article that coined the term and outlined the three-part method — fluid grids, flexible images, and media queries — that the industry rebuilt itself around. The article is still on the site, still dated, still readable. The piece that named the thing is available at the URL where it was published.

  1. A List Apart founded 1997, initially an email newsletter
  2. Smashing Magazine founded 2006
  3. CSS-Tricks founded by Chris Coyier, 2007
  4. Ethan Marcotte, "Responsive Web Design," A List Apart, May 2010
  5. CSS Grid shipped: Chrome 57 and Firefox 52, March 2017
  6. CSS-Tricks acquired by DigitalOcean, March 2022; editorial operation wound down over the following year

Smashing Magazine arrived in 2006 and occupied different ground: longer, more tutorial-facing, and faster to react to the trade concerns of working practitioners. Where A List Apart leaned toward argument and theory, Smashing leaned toward technique and evidence. Both turned out to be necessary. The field needed someone asking what responsive design meant in principle and someone else showing how to implement a twelve-column fluid grid in production. The archives of both sites form an unintentional oral history of what it felt like to work under each successive set of browser limitations.

What CSS-Tricks was for

Chris Coyier launched CSS-Tricks in 2007 as an explicitly practical resource — a place to look up how a property worked, how two properties interacted, or why a layout was doing something unexpected. The site's Complete Guide to Flexbox and Complete Guide to Grid became canonical reference documents, the kind of pages that stayed open in a tab for years. When CSS Grid shipped in March 2017 — Chrome 57 and Firefox 52, days apart — practitioners who had been following the spec's development through Rachel Andrew's writing and Jen Simmons's experiments at the Mozilla Developer Relations team had already absorbed the mental model before the browser flags were off. The archive made that continuity possible.

The archives of both sites form an unintentional oral history of what it felt like to work under each successive set of browser limitations.

CSS-Tricks was acquired by DigitalOcean in March 2022. The editorial operation wound down over the following year. The guides remain accessible and remain useful; the CSS-Tricks archive is now effectively a primary source for the period rather than a living publication, which makes its timestamps more important, not less.

A wall of printed page proofs pinned in a grid, a person standing in front reaching up to move one sheet. Wide, straight on, the wall taller than they are
The archive is the field. Everything current is a reply to something in it.

The value of the date

The dated post is a precision instrument. When you read Rachel Andrew writing about grid layout in 2016 — before broad engine support had landed — you read something qualitatively different from a tutorial written after the fact. The tentativeness, the browser conditions, the specific caveats about what IE11 would and would not do: all of it is in the text, and the date is the key that decodes it. Most industries would have this knowledge in meeting notes and version-controlled documents readable by almost no one. Web design published it.

The W3C specifications themselves are versioned and dated, but they are not prose a practitioner reads voluntarily. What A List Apart, Smashing Magazine, and CSS-Tricks did was translate the specification argument into the register of the working web. Brad Frost published "Atomic Design" in sections across blog posts before it became a book; Una Kravets documented CSS custom properties and Houdini experiments in public before they reached stable implementations. The publications gave those ideas an addressable location and a timestamp, which is what makes them citable rather than merely remembered.

The archive is not nostalgia. It is the mechanism by which the field transmitted technique across generations of practitioners who were never in the same room, and it is still there to read, at the URLs where it was published.